田伟,骆方

• 1:北京师范大学中国基础教育质量监测协同创新中心
• 2:北京师范大学心理学部

摘要(Abstract)：

科学探究对于培养学生的创新精神和实践能力具有重要意义，改进科学探究能力的评价方法也是科学教育课程改革的必然要求。在智能时代科学探究能力评价改革可采用新的方法和手段。本文从科学探究能力评价方法演进的角度讨论使用计算机模拟测试方法的必然性，借鉴国际前沿成果总结了智能时代背景下科学探究能力评价的三个理论趋势与实践进展：(1)利用真实情境和动态仿真系统构建全面的概念评价框架；(2)挖掘隐含的科学探究过程信息和规律构建教育教学模型；(3)构建与课程、教学和学习深度融合的新型评价生态系统。鉴于当前我国对利用现代信息技术创新评价工具的现实需求，文章进一步阐述了构建计算机模拟测试工具的思路，并讨论了着力改进课堂评价与科学学科国家义务教育质量监测的途径。展望未来，这种新型的“信息技术+科学探究能力评价”必将带来评价生态系统和科学探究教学的改变，有效解决长期以来科学探究能力评价与课程和教学相脱离的问题，切实促进课程、教学和评价“三位一体”发展，推动教育教学改革取得成效。

关键词(KeyWords)： 科学探究;高阶思维能力;计算机模拟测试;课堂评价;大规模教育评价

Abstract:

Keywords:

基金项目(Foundation): 2021年度基础教育质量监测科研基金项目“科学素养计算机交互式测评研究”（项目批准号：2021-01-088-BZK01）的研究成果

作者(Author): 田伟,骆方

DOI: 10.13541/j.cnki.chinade.2023.02.006

参考文献(References)：

• 何美惠，&叶彩红.（2020）.小学科学学业评价原则和实践要点--以探究性试题编制为例.课程·教材·教法，40(7),124-129.
• 教育部.（2019-11-22）.教育部关于加强和改进中小学实验教学的意见（教基[2019]16号）.中华人民共和国教育部网站.http://www.moe.gov.cn/srcsite/A06/s3321/201911/t20191128_409958.html
• 教育部.（2021-09-24）.教育部关于印发《国家义务教育质量监测方案（2021年修订版）》的通知（教督[2021]2号）.中华人民共和国教育部网站.http://www.moe.gov.cn/srcsite/A11/moe_1789/202109/t20210926_567095.html
• 教育部.（2022）.义务教育科学课程标准（2022年版）.北京师范大学出版社.
• 李菲茗，张浩，林丽娟，&黄怡.（2020）.计算机交互式评价的开发研究--以科学探究为例.中国远程教育（5),29-37.
• 李锋.（2019）.学生问题解决能力的评价：在线伴随的视角.中国远程教育（8),79-84.
• 宋歌.（2017）.国外科学教育中的表现性评价述评.外国中小学教育（6),17-25.
• 王建明，陈仕品，&刁永锋.（2011）.多用户虚拟学习环境River City的项目分析及其启示.电化教育研究（7),61-66.
• 中共中央，&国务院.（2019-06-23）.中共中央国务院关于深化教育教学改革全面提高义务教育质量的意见.中华人民共和国教育部网站.http://www.moe.gov.cn/jyb_xxgk/moe_1777/moe_1778/201907/t20190708_389416.html
• 中共中央，&国务院.（2020-10-13）.中共中央国务院印发《深化新时代教育评价改革总体方案》.中华人民共和国中央人民政府网站.http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/2020-10/13/content_5551032.htm
• 周文叶，&董泽华.（2021）.表现性评价质量框架的构建与应用.课程·教材·教法，41(10),120-127.
• Baker,R.S.,Clarke Midura,J.,&Ocumpaugh,J.(2016).Towards general models of effective science inquiry in virtual performance assessments.Journal of Computer Assisted Learning,32(3),267-280.
• Behrens,J.(2009,September 28).Response to assessment of student learning in science simulations and games.Networking,Cloud,and Cybersecurity Solutions.https://sites.nationalacademies.org/cs/groups/dbassesite/documents/webpage/dbasse_080067.pdf
• Buckley,B.C.,&Quellmalz,E.S.(2013).Supporting and assessing complex biology learning with computer-based simulations and representations.In D.Treagust,&C.Y.Tsui (Eds.),Multiple representations in biological education.Models and modeling in science education,Vol.7 (pp.247-267).Springer.
• Clarke-Midura,J.,Dede,C.,&Norton,J.(2011).Next generation assessments for measuring complex learning in science.In D.Plank,J.Norton,C.Arraez,&I.Washington (Eds.),The road ahead for state assessments (pp.27-40).Rennie Center for Education Research&Policy.
• Eichmann,B.,Greiff,S.,Naumann,J.,Brandhuber,L.,&Goldhammer,F.(2020).Exploring behavioural patterns during complex problem-solving.Journal of Computer Assisted Learning,36(6),933-956.
• Evagorou,M.,Korfiatis,K.,Nicolaou,C.,&Constantinou,C.(2009).An investigation of the potential of interactive simulations for developing system thinking skills in elementary school:A case study with fifth-graders and sixth-graders.International Journal of Science Education,31(5),655-674.
• Gobert,J.D.,Sao Pedro,M.,Raziuddin,J.,&Baker,R.S.(2013).From log files to assessment metrics:Measuring students’science inquiry skills using educational data mining.Journal of the Learning Sciences,22(4),521-563.
• Goldhammer,F.,&Zehner,F.(2017).What to make of and how to interpret process data.Measurement:Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives,15(3-4),128-132.
• Greiff,S.,Molnár,G.,Martin,R.,Zimmermann,J.,&Csapó,B.(2018).Students’exploration strategies in computer-simulated complex problem environments:A latent class approach.Computers&Education,126,248-263.
• Han,Z.,He,Q.,&von Davier,M.(2019).Predictive feature generation and selection using process data from PISA interactive problem-solving items:Anapplicationofrandomforests.FrontiersinPsychology,10,2461.
• Harmon,M.(1999).Performance assessment in the Third International Mathematics and Science Study--An international perspective.Studies in Educational Evaluation,25(3),243-262.
• He,Q.,&von Davier,M.(2015).Identifying feature sequences from process data in problem-solving items with n-grams.In L.van der Ark,D.Bolt,W.C.Wang,J.Douglas,&S.M.Chow (Eds.),Quantitative Psychology Research.Springer Proceedings in Mathematics&Statistics,Vol.140 (pp.173-190).Springer.
• Ketelhut,D.J.(2007).The impact of student self-efficacy on scientific inquiry skills:An exploratory investigation in River City,a multi-user virtual environment.Journal of Science Education and Technology,16(1),99-111.
• Li,H.,Gobert,J.,Graesser,A.,&Dickler,R.(2018).Advanced educational technology for science inquiry assessment.Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences,5(2),171-178.
• OECD.(1999,June 11).Measuring student knowledge and skills:a new framework for assessment.Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264173125-en
• OECD.(2010,August 25).PISA computer-based assessment of student skills in science.Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264082038-en
• OECD.(2017,August 31).PISA 2015 assessment and analytical framework:Science,reading,mathematic,financial literacy and collaborative problem solving (revised edition).Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/978926428 1820-en
• Perdue,H.B.,Matthews,T.,&Stooksberry,L.(2019,February).Science framework for the 2019 national assessment of educational progress.U.S.Department of Education.https://www.nagb.gov/content/dam/nagb/en/documents/publications/frameworks/science/2019-science-framework.pdf
• Quellmalz,E.S.,Davenport,J.L.,Timms,M.J.,DeBoer,G.E.,Jordan,K.A.,Huang,C.-W.,&Buckley,B.C.(2013).Next-generation environments for assessing and promoting complex science learning.Journal of Educational Psychology,105(4),1100-1114.
• Quellmalz,E.S.,&Pellegrino,J.W.(2009).Technology and testing.Science,323(5910),75-79.
• Quellmalz,E.S.,Silberglitt,M.D.,Buckley,B.C.,Loveland,M.T.,&Brenner,D.G.(2020).Simulations for supporting and assessing science literacy.In Information Resources Management Association(Eds.),Learning and performance assessment:concepts,methodologies,tools,and applications (pp.760-799).IGI Global.
• Quellmalz,E.S.,Timms,M.J.,Buckley,B.C.,Davenport,J.,Loveland,M.,&Silberglitt,M.D.(2012).21st century dynamic assessment.In M.C.Mayrath,J.Clarke-Midura,D.H.Robinson,&G.Schraw(Eds.),Technology-based assessments for 21st century skills:Theoretical and practical implications from modern research (pp.55-89).Information Age Publishing.
• Quellmalz,E.S.,Timms,M.,&Schneider,S.(2009).Assessment of student learning in science simulations and games.Academia.edu.https://www.academia.edu/15333866/Assessment_of_Student_Learning_in_Science_Simulations_and_Games.
• Rupp,A.A.,Levy,R.,Dicerbo,K.E.,Sweet,S.J.,Crawford,A.V.,Cali?o,T.,Benson,M.,Fay,D.,Kunze,K.L.,Mislevy,R.J.,&Behrens,J.T.(2012).Putting ECD into practice:The interplay of theory and data in evidence models within a digital learning environment.Journal of Educational Data Mining,4(1),49-102.
• Scalise,K.,&Clarke-Midura,J.(2018).The many faces of scientific inquiry:Effectively measuring what students do and not only what they say.Journal of Research in Science Teaching,55(10),1469-1496.
• Shavelson,R.J.,Baxter,G.P.,&Pine,J.(1991).Performance assessment in science.Applied Measurement in Education,4(4),347-362.
• Stecher,B.M.,Klein,S.P.,Solano-Flores,G.,McCaffrey,D.,Robyn,A.,Shavelson,R.J.,&Haertel,E.(2000).The effects of content,format,and inquiry level on science performance assessment scores.Applied Measurement in Education,13(2),139-160.
• Tang,X.,Wang,Z.,He,Q.,Liu,J.,&Ying,Z.(2020).Latent feature extraction for process data via multidimensional scaling.Psychometrika,85(2),378-397.
• Teig,N.,Scherer,R.,&Kj?rnsli,M.(2020).Identifying patterns of students’performance on simulated inquiry tasks using PISA 2015 log-file data.Journal of Research in Science Teaching,57(9),1400-1429.
• von Davier,A.A.,Hao,J.,Liu,L.,&Kyllonen,P.C.(2017).Interdisciplinary research agenda in support of assessment of collaborative problem solving:Lessons learned from developing a collaborative science assessment prototype.Computers in Human Behavior,76,631-640.
• Wilson,M.R.,&Bertenthal,M.W.(2006).Systems for state science assessment.National Research Council of the National Academies.https://nap.nationalacademies.org/catalog/11312/systems-for-state-scienceassessment.
• Winick,D.M.,Avallone,A.P.,Smith,C.E.,&Crovo,M.(2008,September).Science framework for the 2009 national assessment of educational progress.U.S.Department of Education.https://www.nagb.gov/content/dam/nagb/en/documents/publications/frameworks/science/2009-science-framework.pdf