吴遐,高记,刘兵

• 1:河北工业大学经济管理学院

摘要(Abstract)：

同伴互评是一种成本效益高、功能强大的评估方法,不仅减轻了教师的工作量,也给学生的学习带来了许多潜在的好处,但同伴互评仍面临着如何提高其有效性的挑战。本文以现有的研究为基础,基于班杜拉的三元交互决定论,构建了同伴互评体系,进而从互评个体、互评环境和互评行为的角度设计了同伴互评体系的有效组织程序,并通过实验的方式检验了同伴互评体系的有效性。

关键词(KeyWords)： 同伴互评;三元交互决定论;互评个体;互评环境;互评行为

Abstract:

Keywords:

基金项目(Foundation):

作者(Author): 吴遐,高记,刘兵

DOI: 10.13541/j.cnki.chinade.2020.04.008

参考文献(References)：

• 班杜拉.2015.社会学习理论[M].陈欣银,李伯黍,译.北京：中国人民大学出版社.
• 杜昊.2019.基于三元交互决定论的大学生阅读素养研究[J].图书馆工作与研究(1):14-18.
• 范逸洲,冯菲,刘玉,等.2018.评价量规设计对慕课同伴互评有效性的影响研究[J].电化教育研究(11):1-6.
• 高记,吴遐,许长勇.2018.基于关联主义MOOC的翻转课堂教学模式构建与应用[J].中国电化教育(10):101-106.
• 金凌志,王小敏.2011.基于三元交互决定论的博士生创新能力培养[J].高等教育研究,32(4):49-53.
• 李梅,刘英群,周潜.2016.同伴评价的可信度与特点分析[J].电化教育研究,37(9):48-54.
• 李菲茗,李晓菲,黄亚平.2018.训练对同伴互评评分准确性的影响：以“三维动画设计与建模”课程为例[J].中国远程教育(5):63-67,78.
• 刘邦祥,宋海涛,克劳斯·基尔,吴保林.2010.如何评价行动导向教学中学生的能力发展：关于评价能力发展的方案设计[J].中国职业技术教育(3):55-59.
• 刘迎春,朱旭,陈乐.2019.精准教学中基于同伴互评的评价者认知网络分析[J].远程教育杂志,37(1):85-93.
• 马捷,贾荟珍.2019.自我效能视角下阅读推广三元交互模型构建[J].图书与情报(2):46-56.
• 马玉慧,赵乐,刘晴.2016.在线同伴评价的影响因素及其促进策略研究[J].电化教育研究,37(3):108-114.
• 舒存叶.2017.网络同伴互评系统的设计和优化[J].电化教育研究,38(1):80-85.
• 王妍莉,杨彦军,崔向平.2018.促进理解的在线同伴互评机制研究[J].现代教育技术,28(12):48-54.
• 夏正江.2005.论课程观的转型及其对新课改的影响[J].课程·教材·教法(3):8-14.
• 叶萍.2014.同伴互评法在英语演讲课堂中的应用研究[J].外语教学,35(4):46-50.
• 殷宝媛,刘俊强,于纪明.2012.同伴互评电子作品的影响因素分析[J].电化教育研究,33(12):58-62.
• 张义兵,孙俊梅,木塔里甫.2018.基于知识建构的同伴互评教学实践研究[J].电化教育研究,39(7):108-113.
• Admiraal,W.,Huisman,B.,&Van de Ven,M.(2014).Self-and peer assessment in massive open online courses.International Journal of Higher Education,3(3):119-128.
• Cho,Y.H.,&Cho,K.(2011).Peer reviewers learn from giving comments.Instructional Science,39(5):629-643.
• De Boer,J.,Ho,A.D.,Stump,G.S.,&Breslow,L.(2014).Changing‘course’:Reconceptualizing educational variables for massive open online courses.Educational Researcher,43(2):74-84.
• De Dreu,C.K.W.,&Nauta,A.(2009).Self-interest and other-orientation in organizational behavior:Implications for job performance,prosocial behavior,and personal initiative.Journal of Applied Psychology,94:913-926.
• Demiraslan?evik,Y.(2015).Assessor or assessee?Investigating the differential effects of online peer assessment roles in the development of students’problem-solving skills.Computers in Human Behavior,52:250-258.
• Falchikov,N.,&Goldfinch,J.(2000).Student peer assessment in higher education:A meta-analysis comparing peer and teacher marks.Review of Educational Research,70(3):287-322.
• Gielen,S.,Peeters,E.,Dochy,F.,Onghena,P.,&Struyven,K.(2010).Improving the effectiveness of peer feedback for learning.Learning and Instruction,20(4):304-315.
• Hanrahan,S.J.,&Isaacs,G.(2010).Assessing self-and peer-assessment:The students’views.Higher Education Research&Development,20(1):53-70.
• Heller,M.L.,&Cassady,J.C.(2017).Predicting community college and university student success:A test of the triadic reciprocal model for two populations.Journal of College Student Retention:Research,Theory&Practice,18(4):431-456.
• Luo,H.,Robinson,A.C.,&Park,J.(2014).Peer grading in a MOOC:Reliability,validity,and perceived effects.Online Learning:Official Journal of the Online Learning Consortium,18(2):119-126.
• Meek,S.E.M.,Blakemore,L.,&Marks,L.(2017).Is peer review an appropriate form of assessment in a MOOC?Student participation and performance in formative peer review.Assessment&Evaluation in Higher Education,42(6):1-14.
• Morris,J.(2001).Peer assessment:A missing link between teaching and learning?A review of the literature.Nurse Education Today,21(7):507-515.
• Suen,H.K.(2014).Peer assessment for massive open online courses(MOOCs).The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning,15(3):76-87.
• Topping,K.J.(2009).Peer assessment.Theory Into Practice,48(1):20-27.
• Topping,K.J.(1998).Peer assessment between students in colleges and universities.Review of Educational Research,68(3):249-276.
• Topping,K.(2017).Peer assessment:Learning by judging and discussing the work of other learners.Interdisciplinary Education and Psychology,1(1):7-14.
• Wahid,U.,Chatti,M.A.,&Schroeder,U.(2016).A systematic analysis of peer assessment in the MOOC era and future perspectives.In Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Mobile,Hybrid,and On-line Learning.
• Yu,F.Y.,&Wu,C.P.(2016).Predictive effects of the quality of online peer-feedback provided and received on primary school students’quality of question-generation.Educational Technology&Society,19(3):234-246.