方静,刘三女牙,何秀玲,李洋洋,刘智

• 1:华中师范大学国家数字化学习工程技术研究中心
• 2:华中师范大学教育大数据应用技术国家工程研究中心

摘要(Abstract)：

混合教学作为在线学习的常态化路径，在自主学习阶段面临学习者认知投入不足的困扰。概念图能够通过帮助学习者在学习过程中有意识地从学习材料中提取新信息并与已有知识建立连接以促进认知投入。因此，围绕概念图工具在混合教学自主学习阶段的应用问题，本研究基于ICAP (Interactive,Constructive, Active, and Passive)学习方式分类学理论、有意义学习理论和活动理论双驱动认知投入干预策略，设计了指向交互建构的学习活动流程和促进有意义交互的学习策略。学习活动流程设计引导学习者在自主学习阶段从参与被动学习活动向参与交互学习活动发展；学习策略设计为学习者参与建构类和交互类学习活动过程提供可操作性的认知策略，确保在自主学习的过程中有意义交互的发生。同时，通过准实验研究验证基于干预策略的混合教学的有效性。实验结果表明，基于干预策略的混合教学对于学习者知识水平以及以元认知意识和沟通能力为代表的高阶思维能力具有促进作用。

关键词(KeyWords)： 混合教学;自主学习;认知投入;ICAP;有意义学习;活动理论;概念图;干预策略

Abstract:

Keywords:

基金项目(Foundation): 2021年度国家自然科学基金面上项目“学习者高阶思维活动感知与归因分析研究”（项目编号：6217703）的研究成果

作者(Author): 方静,刘三女牙,何秀玲,李洋洋,刘智

DOI: 10.13541/j.cnki.chinade.2023.04.003

参考文献(References)：

• 曹梅，&马悦.（2020）.翻转课堂课前深层次学习的问题生成策略研究.电化教育研究，41(11),101-107.
• 冯晓英，孙雨薇，&曹洁婷.（2019）.“互联网+”时代的混合式学习：学习理论与教法学基础.中国远程教育（2),7-16,92.
• 李海峰，&王炜.（2020）.翻转课堂课前与课中双向深度学习探究--基于天平式耦合深度学习模型的三轮迭代实验.现代教育技术，30(12),55-61.
• 李炜.（2018).MOOC背景下三种常见混合式教学模式的比较研究.现代教育技术，28(S1),5-10.
• 马婧.（2020）.混合教学环境下大学生学习投入影响机制研究--教学行为的视角.中国远程教育（2),57-67.
• 马婧，韩锡斌，&程建钢.（2018）.促进学习投入的混合教学活动设计研究.清华大学教育研究，39(3),67-75,92.
• 秦瑾若，&傅钢善.（2017）.基于深度学习理论的MOOC学习活动设计--以“现代教育技术”课程为例.现代教育技术，27(5),12-18.
• 宋灵青，&许林.（2020）.疫情时期学生居家学习方式、学习内容与学习模式构建.电化教育研究，41(5),18-26.
• 王冬青，裴文君，罗力强，&任光杰.（2020）.高校MOOC在线教学模式与实施策略研究--基于全日制研究生在线学习现状和需求的分析.研究生教育研究（5),46-52.
• 王志军，赵宏，&陈丽.（2017）.基于远程学习教学交互层次塔的学习活动设计.中国远程教育（6),39-47,80.
• 杨开城.（2005）.以学习活动为中心的教学设计理论：教学设计理论的新探索.电子工业出版社.
• 约瑟夫·D.诺瓦克.（2016）.学习、创造与使用知识：概念图促进企业和学校的学习变革（赵国庆等译）.人民邮电出版社.
• 张思，何晶铭，上超望，夏丹，&胡泉.（2020）.面向在线学习协同知识建构的认知投入分析模型及应用.远程教育杂志，38(04),95-104.
• 张雯雯，姜强，&赵蔚.（2020）.学习投入视角下在线协作知识建构教学模式设计与实践.开放学习研究，25(04),43-48,62.
• 张晓峰，李明喜，俞建慧，&吴刚.（2020）.面向学习云空间的认知投入量化研究.中国远程教育（5),18-28,76-77.
• 张晓娟，&吕立杰.（2018).SPOC平台下指向深度学习的深度教学模式建构.中国电化教育（4),96-101,130.
• 赵国庆，&熊雅雯.（2018）.应用概念图评价小学数学教师学科知识的实证研究.电化教育研究，39(12),108-115,128.
• 赵国庆，杨宣洋，&熊雅雯.（2019）.论思维可视化工具教学应用的原则和着力点.电化教育研究，40(9),59-66,82.
• 中共中央.（2020）.中共中央关于制定国民经济和社会发展第十四个五年规划和二〇三五年远景目标的建议.中华人民共和国中央政府网站.http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/2020-11/03/content_5556991.htm
• Bliss,J.,Askew,M.,&Macrae,S.(1996).Effective teaching and learning:Scaffolding revisited.Oxford Review of Education,22(1),37-61.
• Chang,D.,Hwang,G.J.,Chang,S.C.,&Wang,S.Y.(2021).Promoting students’cross-disciplinary performance and higher order thinking:A peer assessment-facilitated STEM approach in a mathematics course.Educational Technology Research and Development,69(6),3281-3306.
• Cheng,S.C.,Hwang,G.J.,&Lai,C.L.(2020).Effects of the group leadership promotion approach on students’higher order thinking awareness and online interactive behavioral patterns in a blended learning environment.Interactive Learning Environments,28(2),246-263.
• Chevron,M.P.(2014).A metacognitive tool:Theoretical and operational analysis of skills exercised in structured concept maps.Perspectives in Science,2(1-4),46-54.
• Chi,M.T.H.,Adams,J.,Bogusch,E.B.,Bruchok,C.,Kang,S.,Lancaster,M.,Levy,R.,Li,N.,McEldoon,K.L.,Stump,G.S.,Wylie,R.,Xu,D.,&Yaghmourian,D.L.(2018).Translating the ICAP theory of cognitive engagement into practice.Cognitive Science,42(6),1777-1832.
• Chi,M.T.H.,&Wylie,R.(2014).The ICAP framework:Linking cognitive engagement to active learning outcomes.Educational Psychologist,49(4),219-243.
• Deng,R.,Benckendorff,P.,&Gannaway,D.(2019).Progress and new directions for teaching and learning in MOOCs.Computers&Education,129,48-60.
• de Ries,K.E.,Schaap,H.,van Loon,A.-M.M.J.A.P.,Kral,M.M.H.,&Meijer,P.C.(2022).A literature review of open-ended concept maps as a research instrument to study knowledge and learning.Quality&Quantity,56,73-107.
• Engelmann,T.,&Hesse,F.W.(2010).How digital concept maps about the collaborators’knowledge and information influence computer-supported collaborative problem solving.International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning,5(3),299-319.
• Fox,E.,&Riconscente,M.(2008).Metacognition and self-regulation in James,Piaget,and Vygotsky.Educational Psychology Review,20(4),373-389.
• Hew,K.F.,Cheung,W.S.,&Ng,C.S.L.(2010).Student contribution in asynchronous online discussion:A review of the research and empirical exploration.Instructional Science,38(6),571-606.
• Hmelo-Silver,C.E.(2004).Problem-based learning:What and how do students learn?.Educational Psychology Review,16(3),235-266.
• Hung,W.(2011).Theory to reality:A few issues in implementing problem-based learning.Educational Technology Research and Development,59(4),529-552.
• Hwang,G.,Chang,C.,&Chien,S.(2022).A motivational model-based virtual reality approach to prompting learners’sense of presence,learning achievements,and higher-order thinking in professional safety training.British Journal of Educational Technology,bjet.13196.
• Jonassen,D.H.,&Marra,R.M.(1994).Concept mapping and other formalisms as mindtools for representing knowledge.ALT-J,2(1),50-56.
• Kinchin,I.M.(2014).Concept mapping as a learning tool in higher education:A critical analysis of recent reviews.The Journal of Continuing Higher Education,62(1),39-49.
• Lai,C.L.,&Hwang,G.J.(2014).Effects of mobile learning time on students’conception of collaboration,communication,complex problem-solving,meta-cognitive awareness and creativity.International Journal of Mobile Learning and Organisation,8(3-4),276-291.
• Lam,R.,&Kapur,M.(2018).Preparation for future collaboration:Cognitively preparing for learning from collaboration.The Journal of Experimental Education,86(4),546-559.
• Novak,J.D.(1990).Concept maps and Vee diagrams:Two metacognitive tools to facilitate meaningful learning.Instructional Science,19(1),29-52.
• Pee,L.G.(2020).Enhancing the learning effectiveness of ill-structured problem solving with online co-creation.Studies in Higher Education,45(11),2341-2355.
• Rasheed,R.A.,Kamsin,A.,&Abdullah,N.A.(2020).Challenges in the online component of blended learning:A systematic review.Computers&Education,144,103701.
• Reiter-Palmon,R.,Sinha,T.,Gevers,J.,Odobez,J.M.,&Volpe,G.(2017).Theories and models of teams and groups.Small Group Research,48(5),544-567.
• Ritchhart,R.,Turner,T.,&Hadar,L.(2009).Uncovering students’thinking about thinking using concept maps.Metacognition and Learning,4(2),145-159.
• Roessger,K.M.,Daley,B.J.,&Hafez,D.A.(2018).Effects of teaching concept mapping using practice,feedback,and relational framing.Learning and Instruction,54,11-21.
• Rubenstein,L.D.,Ridgley,L.M.,Callan,G.L.,Karami,S.,&Ehlinger,J.(2018).How teachers perceive factors that influence creativity development:Applying a Social Cognitive Theory perspective.Teaching and Teacher Education,70,100-110.
• Shi,Y.,Tong,M.,&Long,T.(2021).Investigating relationships among blended synchronous learning environments,students’motivation,and cognitive engagement:A mixed methods study.Computers&Education,168,104193.
• Song,D.,&Kim,D.(2021).Effects of self-regulation scaffolding on online participation and learning outcomes.Journal of Research on Technology in Education,53(3),249-263.
• Strautmane,M.(2012).Concept map-based knowledge assessment tasks and their scoring criteria:An overview.In Concept maps:Theory,methodology,technology.Proceedings of the fifth international conference on concept mapping,2,80-88.
• Sun,M.,Wang,M.,&Wegerif,R.(2019).Using computer-based cognitive mapping to improve students’divergent thinking for creativity development.BritishJournalofEducationalTechnology,50(5),2217-2233.
• Wang,M.,Cheng,B.,Chen,J.,Mercer,N.,&Kirschner,P.A.(2017).The use of web-based collaborative concept mapping to support group learning and interaction in an online environment.The Internet and Higher Education,34,28-40.